For instance, file support has been slower or less robust for some reviewers, and mobile accessibility is less consistent than other devices. TeamViewer’s broad range of use cases comes at the cost of feature depth. LogMeIn Pro’s performance for Mac products are also more limited and less consistent than it is for other device types according to reviewers. Pricing can also be high for some use cases, particularly when larger companies attempt to scale up the tool to a broader user base. LogMeIn Pro is less scalable than TeamViewer, with a much lower cap on the number of managed devices at each pricing tier from an administrative perspective. LogMeIn Pro and TeamViewer also have some limitations or drawbacks worth keeping in mind. It’s also more useable across different device types and operating systems. These use cases make TeamViewer more attractive for IT administrators. TeamViewer is more applicable for organizations that can use TeamViewer across a border range of use cases, from patch management to IoT control to traditional remote support. It’s also easy to users to install and use even without extensive IT experience or prior knowledge. Many of its features are tailored to this group, including robust file transfer and management, as well as LastPass integration for password management. LogMeIn Pro emphasizes its accessibility for end-users to access their own devices. LogMeIn Pro and TeamViewer are focused on serving distinct user bases, and have unique capabilities for each audience. In contrast, TeamViewer is applicable across a wider range of use cases. LogMeIn Pro offers remote access to less specialized users in order to remotely access their own devices with little to no IT support. However, LogMeIn Pro is more tailored to SMB and self-service users, while TeamViewer is more focused on midsize or large companies to enterprises. LogMeIn Pro and TeamViewer are both remote desktop tools. OSS/BSS (Operations Support/Business Support).Professional Employer Organizations (PEO).Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).
0 kommentar(er)
